![]() |
|
|
#901 |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
The biggest similarity between the Bengals and Falcons, is that both teams have terrible secondary play.
My early wishlist for the draft. Two corners in the first round. Leon Hall's injury may force him to safety, his game is suited to play free safety, if the injury limits him. Corners are a premium position. Offensive Guards, this depends on how much Clint Boling improves in the offseason. Many of us loved that pick, but it just goes to show, how depending on rookies, doesn't always work in the NFL. I would prefer an experienced guy from Free Agency. Nate Livings should be a backup, Bobby Williams has slowed down as well. Gotta improve here. A Defensive Tackle is a must at some point. A run plugger would be nice. Runningback, there are running backs all over this draft, from Trent Richardson all the way to Boom Herron and Isiah Pead. A player I like is Chris Polk from Washington. Wide Receiver, Jerome Simpson is likely gone, his dope ring thing and inconsistent play don't compliment AJ Green well. I don't think the market will be huge on him because of the off field issues, so I suspect the price will be right for Mike Brown. I just don't want to bring him back and then, have no backup plan when he goes to jail. Watch out for Devier Posey here. Cincinnati kid, played at Ohio State, perceived to be a mid to late round pick with upside. He could eventually slot into a number 2 role.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
#902 | |
|
Big League Choo!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#903 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#904 | |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
|
#905 | |
|
Big League Choo!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
![]() I do agree they will need address DL depth. Hopefully they can retain at least two of three prior to FA starting and draft another. My dream offseason would be for the Bengals to sign one of Ben Grubbs or Carl Nicks AND LaRon Landry. They could make it happen because they will have the most cap space in the league. Using it will be a different story. Then in the draft, I love the if either/both Kuechly and DeCastro fell to them in the first then grab a corner in the second, running back in the third. |
|
|
|
|
|
#906 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#907 |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Not replace those two. Just quality depth for the rotation.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
#908 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#909 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
I wish the Bengals could find some package to trade up for Trent Richardson. They better not bring back Benson.
|
|
|
|
|
#910 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Our old friend Hue Jackson just got fired by the Raiders. Not that surprising considering what he gave up to get Carson. You kinda knew at the time that he better find a way to make that trade work or he was toast.
|
|
|
|
|
#911 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Carson can't be too happy about now. I wonder what the new GM and coach think about Carson
|
|
|
|
|
#912 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
How he acted the last few weeks likely played a big role in him getting fired.
|
|
|
|
|
#913 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
Here's a scenario for you right off the top of my head: I wonder if the Raiders sign GB FA Matt Flynn to play QB and trade Carson to Pete Carroll in Seattle? |
|
|
|
|
|
#914 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#915 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |